Developing mobile apps for both Android and iOS can be a daunting task, often requiring separate codebases and specialized knowledge for each platform. This is where cross-platform development comes in, offering the ability to share code between platforms to reduce duplication of effort and inconsistency of separate implementation. Among the various solutions, Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) and Compose Multiplatform have emerged as strong contenders, offering a unique approach to sharing code and UI. Let’s dive into what makes this combination compelling, its advantages and disadvantages, and how it stacks up against other popular frameworks.
Kotlin Multiplatform allows you to write shared code in Kotlin that can be compiled to different targets, including Android, iOS, web, desktop, and server-side. This means you can share business logic, networking, data serialization, and other non-UI code between platforms, significantly reducing development time and effort.
Compose Multiplatform takes the power of declarative UI development, popularized by Jetpack Compose for Android, and extends it to other platforms. It lets you build user interfaces using a single codebase that can then be rendered natively on Android, iOS, and other targets. This means you can share not only your logic but also a significant portion of your UI code.
Kotlin Multiplatform works by compiling Kotlin code to different formats. For native targets like iOS, Kotlin code is compiled to native code using an LLVM-based backend for the Kotlin compiler and a native implementation of the Kotlin standard library known as Kotlin/Native. This allows for bidirectional interoperability with Swift/Objective-C with platform-specific APIs and excellent performance. For Android, Kotlin code is compiled to JVM bytecode, just like regular Android development. Compose Multiplatform leverages this by providing a common API for UI components that are then translated into native UI elements on each platform.
While many companies are using Kotlin Multiplatform internally, public examples are still emerging. Some notable examples include:
It’s important to note that many companies use Kotlin Multiplatform for specific modules or features, even if they don’t use it for the entire application. This allows them to benefit from code sharing without a complete rewrite.
Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform offer a compelling alternative to these frameworks by providing a balance between code sharing, native performance, and a modern development experience.
Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform are powerful tools for building cross-platform mobile applications. They offer significant advantages in terms of code sharing, performance, and developer experience. While there are some challenges, the benefits often outweigh the drawbacks, especially for projects where sharing business logic and UI code is crucial. As the ecosystem continues to mature, we can expect to see even wider adoption of this promising technology. If you’re looking for a modern, efficient, and performant way to build cross-platform mobile apps, Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform are definitely worth considering.
If you think Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform could help your team but want a second opinion, reach out to us at Atomic Robot – we’d be happy to help.
Copyright © 2025 JetBrains s.r.o. Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform and the Kotlin Multiplatform and Compose Multiplatform logos are trademarks of JetBrains s.r.o. www.jetbrains.com